New Ground-Breaking Energy Technology

ASKING PRICE: $400M USD

About the Inventor

• Performance: True Efficiency of 45.76%
• Energy Source – Permanent Magnet Matrix
• No Risk Condition for Sale

 

The Inventor

  1. I reside in Canada. My academic training is in Aerospace Engineering and Electronics Engineering Technology. I am the sole inventor of the technology.

Energy Source

  1. There is no “fuel” or external energy put into the technology, all energy is derived solely from the permanent magnet field matrix within it.

Technology Development

  1. It is time for this technology to be developed and capture its share of the global energy market. The heavy lifting has been done.

Website Review by Buyers Team

  1. The content of this web page is technical and designed for review by suitably trained professionals. I would recommend the Buyers staff who will be conducting the review of this web site, be composed of, at a minimum, a Mechanical Engineer and an Electrical Engineer, preferably at a Masters level and who are very conversant with mechanical systems, materials and magnetic field dynamics and behavior.

Website Content Limitations

  1. As stated throughout this web page, I will only provide performance data that has been proven in the lab.

Methods of Calculation

  1. The methods for calculating the work (energy) are straight forward and are well accepted mathematics and physics.

The Physics Explained

  1. Once the conditions of sale have been agreed upon and met, I will explain the physics behind the technology – but not before.
Learn More

A. What You Are Buying

  1. You are buying the physics engineering (core energy technology) which has been developed and experimentally proven in the lab over a 3-year period.
  2. No Risk Condition of Sale: The primary condition of sale is that the buyer will measure the energy (work) produced by the technology in the inventor’s lab apparatus and if measured results do not meet what is claimed, then the Buyer will be refunded any money (escrow or deposit).
  3. Output: The output energy is in the form of Mechanical Work = Force (kg) x Distance (cm).
  4. Force Direction: The core technology generates energy by movement in only one axis, therefore the technology can be applied as a plurality, in a suitably designed rotary system where output is proportional to RPM.

B. Technology Asking Sales Price

  1. As mentioned in the header the asking price is $400 million USD.

C. Market – Size, Opportunity and Buyer Development of the Technology

  1. The energy market in the US is valued at approximately $1.7 trillion annually in USD and globally at approximately $3.3 trillion USD.
  2. This new technology presents a golden opportunity for a company to be first with this technology and thereby capture a significant share of the global energy market.
  3. Can the technology realistically be developed by the Buyer? The key characteristic of the technology which answers this question is the fact that the all energy is derived/generated in one axis only. Because the technology generates energy by movement in only one axis, it can be readily applied as a plurality, in a suitably designed rotary system where output is proportional to RPM.
  4. Answer: “Yes”, the Buyer can realistically develop the technology”.
  5. Proof: This claim is proven in the lab results which will be measured and verified by the Buyers Team as a requirement of the purchase contract.
  6. Most important: If it was not for this key characteristic of the technology, the excellent levels of performance with a True Efficiency = 45.76%, an Energy Yield (for one cycle) = 0.086426667 kg*cm and excellent repeatability of lab data; I would not offer the technology for sale.
  7. Yes – The claims by the Inventor are extraordinary and the proof is extraordinary.

D. Limitation of Information – IP Protection

  1. To protect the Buyer, I have purposely limited information in this website to only the actual performance data, energy source and method of energy calculation.
  2. With data limited in this manner, it will not be possible for anyone or anything (AI) to reverse engineer the technology.

E. Units, Gauges, Variable Definitions and Methods of Energy Calculation

  1. f(z) = force and is measured in kilograms (kg).
  2. Distance is expressed in millimeters (mm) or centimeters (cm).
  3. Gauges are a Torbal FB10 digital force gauge used to measure f(z), a Torbal FB5 used as a control to verify apparatus force measurement system and a standard ruler with smallest units of measure = 1 mm.
  4. Positive energy is in units of kg*cm.
  5. Negative energy is in units of kg*cm.
  6. One Cycle = starts where f(z) = 0.0000 kg and z = 0.0 mm and ends where f(z) = 0.0000 kg and z= 249 mm.
  7. Energy Calculations Integration; Energy Yield and True Efficiency, were calculated using Integration of Functions as per paragraph ‘L” for One Cycle.
  8. Reference Energy Calculation by Simpsons Rule: Energy for One Cycle, was also calculated by Numerical Integration using Simpsons Rule (see paragraph “M”), and is expressed in units of kg*cm. Numerical Integration by Simpsons Rule is used as a second method different from Integration of Functions and serves as a secondary method as a “sanity check”. Correlation between Integration by Function and Integration by Simpsons Rule were found to have a difference of 0.41% (See paragraph “N”), which is considered a good correlation between the two methods.
  9. Data Review: The Inventors data and Energy calculations are of course available for review, bear in mind you will be measuring your own data and completing energy calculations using my spread sheets and in your own computer into your own spread sheets. If you use your own spreadsheets the Inventor will have to review and verify that your calculation methods and results are done properly as paragraphs “E”, “L” and Simpsons Rule calculations for reference as per paragraph “M”.
  10. Energy Yield = Sum of Total Positive energy (kg*cm) – Sum of Total Negative energy (kg*cm). This is the energy liberated from one Cycle.
  11. True Efficiency = (Sum of Total Positive work – Sum of Total Negative work)/Total Positive work and is express as a percentage (%), for one Cycle.

F. Lab Apparatus

  1. The lab apparatus is simple with force measurements taken directly in line with f(z).
  2. A control gauge was used to verify that the force measurement system is correct.
  3. The gauge used for control is a Torbal FB5.

G. Guarantees #1: Performance Calculations and Energy Source

  1. The inventor guarantees the technology meets the following performance and conditions.
  2. That all Energy calculations in paragraph “G.” are done using Integration of Functions as defined in paragraph “L”.
  3. Energy Source is a 4 inch3 volume of permanent magnets arranged in a matrix. The magnet type is Ferrite Ceramic, Class 8.
  4. Sole Energy Source there is no external energy source in the technology, other than the field generated by the permanent magnet’s matrix.
  5. Energy Yield (for one cycle) = 0.086426667 kg*cm +/- 1.5%., calculated as per paragraphs “E”, and “L” and;
  6. True Efficiency (for one cycle) = 45.76% +/- 1.5%, calculated as per paragraphs “E” and “L”.

H. Guarantee #2: Customer Verification of Performance and Refund

  1. Data Collection: You and/or your representative will confirm the technology’s performance by measuring f(z) every mm, for one complete cycle, on the inventor’s lab apparatus (under the guidance of the inventor).
  2. You will then use this data to calculate Energy Yield, and True Efficiency using the Integration of Functions method detailed in paragraph “L” and formulas as per paragraph “E”. These calculations are to be made available to and under the observation and verification by the inventor, to ensure correctness of data entries, energy calculations as per paragraphs “E” and “L” and that no data has been manipulated in any of these calculations.
  3. In the case where the Buyer or your team bring their own computer(s), then the Inventor must be provided access to these computers to verify data entry is correct as measurements are made and that Energy Calculations have been performed as per paragraphs “E” and “L” and that no data has been manipulated in any of these calculations.
  4. You and or your team, will also verify there is no external or internal energy source in the lab apparatus other than, the field generated by the permanent magnet matrix.
  5. If your measured data and corresponding calculations and conditions as per paragraph “H” do not meet performance detailed in paragraph “G”, then any funds made towards the purchase (i.e. escrow, deposited) will be returned to the Buyer.

I. Support and Equipment

  1. The inventor will provide computer access to record the measured data and make the calculations indicated above.
  2. In the case where the Buyer or your team bring their own computer(s), then the Inventor must be provided access to these computers to verify and witness data entries are correct as measurements are made and entered and that, Energy Calculations have been performed as per paragraphs “E” and “L”.

J. Technology Security and Limitation of Technical Data

  1. No information with respect to the technology has been revealed to anyone. The lab apparatus and computer records are kept in a locked room inside a locked structure.

K. Energy Visibility – Info

  1. When you plot and review the raw data as a graph of force vs distance for one cycle, it is visually very obvious where the energy comes from.

L. Energy Calculations: Regression and Integration of Function

  1. Function Determination by Data Regression; The data collected by the Inventor was regressed using regression software by quadratic, to derive the function for 3 data points at a time for the whole data set (z = 0 mm to f = 249 mm).
  2. 3 Point Data Grouping – Clarification: Data points were regressed as follows.
  3. Data points a, b, c were regressed,
  4. Then data points c, d, e were regressed.
  5. Then data points e, f, g were regressed…. and so on for the whole data set of 250 points.
  6. 3 Point Data Integration: Once the quadratic equation was found by 3-point regression as discussed above, the quadratic was then integrated for the same 3 data points used in regression. Then the areas summed to get the total energy under the curve. Using this method Energy Yield, and True Efficiency were calculated.

M. 2nd Method of Area calculation – Simpsons Rule

  1. Simpsons Rule was used by the Inventor as a second method (sanity check) to calculate the area under the curve. The Simpsons Rule method was applied to the whole dataset of 249 points.
  2. The equation used for the Simpsons Rule is shown below.
  3. b∫af(x) dx ≈ Tn = △x/3 [f(x0) + 2f(x1) + 4f(x2) +2f(x3) + 4f(x4) ….2f(xn-1) + f(xn)]
  4. This equation was easily set up on an Excel spread sheet and is of course available for review and/use.

N. Comparison – Integration of Function vs Simpson Rule

  1. Integration of Function and Simpsons Rule give different results as they are different methods, however; Simpsons rule agrees with Integration by Function to within 0.41% which is considered a good correlation and validates both methods to each other.

O. Purchase Proposals

  1. For security reasons, first contact will be made via e-mail.
  2. After I confirm the following information (who you actually are), I will send you a reply email, then we can set up more formal lines of communication.
  3. Please send the following information to physicseng01@gmail.com
  4. Your Company e-mail address
  5. Your full name
  6. Your position at the company
  7. Name of the Company you represent.
  8. Full address of your company’s head Office, and
  9. Your Head Office main phone number

P. First Meeting

  1. Once I have verified who you are and we have an agreed upon contract with your company/corporation, we can proceed.